Bet as shown. Spin the roulette wheel (‹SPIN› button), then CLICK ON THE NUMBER here ↓
|0||3||6||9||12||15||18||21||24||27||30||33||36||2 to 1|
|2||5||8||11||14||17||20||23||26||29||32||35||2 to 1|
|1||4||7||10||13||16||19||22||25||28||31||34||2 to 1|
|1st 12||2nd 12||3rd 12|
|1 to 18||Even||Odd||19 to 36|
- Roulette is a casino game named after the French word meaning little wheel.In the game, players may choose to place bets on either a single number, various groupings of numbers, the colors red or black, whether the number is odd or even, or if the numbers are high (19–36) or low (1–18).
- Chaussure A Roulette 29 of times you have to bet your bonus amount to be able to cash out winnings from it. For instance, you may get a $25 no deposit bonus with a 30x wagering requirement. This means you will have to wager a total of $750 – 30 times $25 – to cashout the maximum cap Chaussure A Roulette 29 winning amount.
29 Buren Roulette transactions shall be investigated by 29 Buren Roulette the company and, if necessary, a suspicious transaction report will be made by 29 Buren Roulette the company to the competent Maltese or UK Authorities (or other appropriate authorities).
What is the basic idea of the Roulette Predictor program?
Our online Predictor is the best helper for Roulette players in the casino. This program is not only a set of Random Number Generator (RNG) algorithms of various casinos but also a Roulette results analyzer, which is based on mathematical calculations and probability theory.
How can I use it?
All roulette field numbers are clickable. When you click on a number, the result is added to the result history and is reconciled with RNG algorithms and patterns.
Aside from that, the program calculates probabilities for the next result and offers the most winning bets on the Roulette playing field.
In the “2to1” and “dozen” row bet fields, the program shows the bets to be placed. The bet is displayed as a chip with the size of the bet amount.
After launching the Roulette Predictor, the system will indicate the starting bet. Make such a bet when gambling in a casino.
Start the Roulette and when the result is shown, click on the number that appears on this page.
The program will enter the result in the history of the current game, run the algorithms, and present the next bet, which has the maximum probability of winning.
Russian Roulette 29 Oct 2011 Youtube
DEFAULT settings (universal betting systems) are available in 2 versions:
- - smooth - small wins and small losses equals slow growth of game balance. This setting is recommended for those who love playing long online games.
- - aggressive - big wins and even bigger losses. The rapid growth of the player’s score. The game should not be delayed since the distortion in a series can quickly change the score.
When configuring the settings in Roulette from a particular online casino, bets will be calculated according to the Roulette limit for that particular casino.
Sky vegas joining bonus. Besides, the RNG templates of this casino built into the Predictor algorithm will be used, which significantly increases the accuracy of calculations!
Features of the online program
- When you launch the program or reset the results for the first time, the system indicates the starting bet. It is worth noting that in this case, you will get test bets, which are necessary to start the analysis. Predictor algorithms are launched from the 3rd bet (only when you launch the program for the first time, change settings, and reset the results)
- When using standard DEFAULT systems, use the odds and adjust the bets according to the limits of the Roulette you are playing at. The minimum bet in these settings is 1 unit.
For instance, if you play Roulette, where the minimum bet on the «dozen» is $5, then the bets shown in the program should be multiplied by 5.
- If the offered bet gets too high for you, press the «Reset» button. You will get a minimum (starting) bet, whereas all the algorithms and history will still be running.
To reset all results and game history, you need to leave this page (for instance, go to another website page of casinotip.net) and return to it once again.
Our development team will be constantly updating the algorithms and adding new casinos in which this free program has been tested. Stay tuned!
Have a good game!
A martingale is any of a class of betting strategies that originated from and were popular in 18th-century France. The simplest of these strategies was designed for a game in which the gambler wins the stake if a coin comes up heads and loses if it comes up tails. The strategy had the gambler double the bet after every loss, so that the first win would recover all previous losses plus win a profit equal to the original stake.
Since a gambler will almost surely eventually flip heads, the martingale betting strategy is certain to make money for the gambler provided they have infinite wealth and there is no limit on money earned in a single bet. However, no gambler possess infinite wealth, and the exponential growth of the bets can bankrupt unlucky gamblers who chose to use the martingale, causing a catastrophic loss. Despite the fact that the gambler usually wins a small net reward, thus appearing to have a sound strategy, the gambler's expected value remains zero because the small probability that the gambler will suffer a catastrophic loss exactly balances with the expected gain. In a casino, the expected value is negative, due to the house's edge. Additionally, as the likelihood of a string of consecutive losses occurs more often than common intuition suggests, martingale strategies can bankrupt a gambler quickly.
The martingale strategy has also been applied to roulette, as the probability of hitting either red or black is close to 50%.
The fundamental reason why all martingale-type betting systems fail is that no amount of information about the results of past bets can be used to predict the results of a future bet with accuracy better than chance. In mathematical terminology, this corresponds to the assumption that the win-loss outcomes of each bet are independent and identically distributed random variables, an assumption which is valid in many realistic situations. It follows from this assumption that the expected value of a series of bets is equal to the sum, over all bets that could potentially occur in the series, of the expected value of a potential bet times the probability that the player will make that bet. In most casino games, the expected value of any individual bet is negative, so the sum of many negative numbers will also always be negative.
The martingale strategy fails even with unbounded stopping time, as long as there is a limit on earnings or on the bets (which is also true in practice). It is only with unbounded wealth, bets and time that it could be argued that the martingale becomes a winning strategy.
The impossibility of winning over the long run, given a limit of the size of bets or a limit in the size of one's bankroll or line of credit, is proven by the optional stopping theorem.
However, without these limits, the martingale betting strategy is certain to make money for the gambler because the chance of at least one coin flip coming up heads approaches one as the number of coin flips approaches infinity.
Mathematical analysis of a single round
Roulette 2013 Movie
Let one round be defined as a sequence of consecutive losses followed by either a win, or bankruptcy of the gambler. After a win, the gambler 'resets' and is considered to have started a new round. A continuous sequence of martingale bets can thus be partitioned into a sequence of independent rounds. Following is an analysis of the expected value of one round.
Let q be the probability of losing (e.g. for American double-zero roulette, it is 20/38 for a bet on black or red). Let B be the amount of the initial bet. Let n be the finite number of bets the gambler can afford to lose.
The probability that the gambler will lose all n bets is qn. When all bets lose, the total loss is
The probability the gambler does not lose all n bets is 1 − qn. In all other cases, the gambler wins the initial bet (B.) Thus, the expected profit per round is
Whenever q > 1/2, the expression 1 − (2q)n < 0 for all n > 0. Thus, for all games where a gambler is more likely to lose than to win any given bet, that gambler is expected to lose money, on average, each round. Increasing the size of wager for each round per the martingale system only serves to increase the average loss.
Suppose a gambler has a 63 unit gambling bankroll. The gambler might bet 1 unit on the first spin. On each loss, the bet is doubled. Thus, taking k as the number of preceding consecutive losses, the player will always bet 2k units.
With a win on any given spin, the gambler will net 1 unit over the total amount wagered to that point. Once this win is achieved, the gambler restarts the system with a 1 unit bet.
With losses on all of the first six spins, the gambler loses a total of 63 units. This exhausts the bankroll and the martingale cannot be continued.
In this example, the probability of losing the entire bankroll and being unable to continue the martingale is equal to the probability of 6 consecutive losses: (10/19)6 = 2.1256%. The probability of winning is equal to 1 minus the probability of losing 6 times: 1 − (10/19)6 = 97.8744%.
The expected amount won is (1 × 0.978744) = 0.978744.
The expected amount lost is (63 × 0.021256)= 1.339118.
Thus, the total expected value for each application of the betting system is (0.978744 − 1.339118) = −0.360374 .
In a unique circumstance, this strategy can make sense. Suppose the gambler possesses exactly 63 units but desperately needs a total of 64. Assuming q > 1/2 (it is a real casino) and he may only place bets at even odds, his best strategy is bold play: at each spin, he should bet the smallest amount such that if he wins he reaches his target immediately, and if he doesn't have enough for this, he should simply bet everything. Eventually he either goes bust or reaches his target. This strategy gives him a probability of 97.8744% of achieving the goal of winning one unit vs. a 2.1256% chance of losing all 63 units, and that is the best probability possible in this circumstance. However, bold play is not always the optimal strategy for having the biggest possible chance to increase an initial capital to some desired higher amount. If the gambler can bet arbitrarily small amounts at arbitrarily long odds (but still with the same expected loss of 10/19 of the stake at each bet), and can only place one bet at each spin, then there are strategies with above 98% chance of attaining his goal, and these use very timid play unless the gambler is close to losing all his capital, in which case he does switch to extremely bold play.
Alternative mathematical analysis
The previous analysis calculates expected value, but we can ask another question: what is the chance that one can play a casino game using the martingale strategy, and avoid the losing streak long enough to double one's bankroll.
As before, this depends on the likelihood of losing 6 roulette spins in a row assuming we are betting red/black or even/odd. Many gamblers believe that the chances of losing 6 in a row are remote, and that with a patient adherence to the strategy they will slowly increase their bankroll.
In reality, the odds of a streak of 6 losses in a row are much higher than many people intuitively believe. Psychological studies have shown that since people know that the odds of losing 6 times in a row out of 6 plays are low, they incorrectly assume that in a longer string of plays the odds are also very low. When people are asked to invent data representing 200 coin tosses, they often do not add streaks of more than 5 because they believe that these streaks are very unlikely. This intuitive belief is sometimes referred to as the representativeness heuristic.
Blackjack 29 Upgrades
In a classic martingale betting style, gamblers increase bets after each loss in hopes that an eventual win will recover all previous losses. The anti-martingale approach, also known as the reverse martingale, instead increases bets after wins, while reducing them after a loss. The perception is that the gambler will benefit from a winning streak or a 'hot hand', while reducing losses while 'cold' or otherwise having a losing streak. As the single bets are independent from each other (and from the gambler's expectations), the concept of winning 'streaks' is merely an example of gambler's fallacy, and the anti-martingale strategy fails to make any money. If on the other hand, real-life stock returns are serially correlated (for instance due to economic cycles and delayed reaction to news of larger market participants), 'streaks' of wins or losses do happen more often and are longer than those under a purely random process, the anti-martingale strategy could theoretically apply and can be used in trading systems (as trend-following or 'doubling up'). (But see also dollar cost averaging.)
Blackjack 29 Proboat
- ^ abMichael Mitzenmacher; Eli Upfal (2005), Probability and computing: randomized algorithms and probabilistic analysis, Cambridge University Press, p. 298, ISBN978-0-521-83540-4, archived from the original on October 13, 2015
- ^Lester E. Dubins; Leonard J. Savage (1965), How to gamble if you must: inequalities for stochastic processes, McGraw Hill
- ^Larry Shepp (2006), Bold play and the optimal policy for Vardi's casino, pp 150–156 in: Random Walk, Sequential Analysis and Related Topics, World Scientific
- ^Martin, Frank A. (February 2009). 'What were the Odds of Having Such a Terrible Streak at the Casino?'(PDF). WizardOfOdds.com. Retrieved 31 March 2012.